Sunday, August 28, 2011

They’re a Wired Mob

Bruce Guthrie’s recent article in The Age newspaper goes straight to an issue close to my heart. Crowd behaviour at the footy.

It’s become topical since Collingwood president Eddie McGuire confronted his club’s cheer squad over “dehumanising” abuse of a St Kilda player. McGuire publicly stated that there’s no place for that sort of behaviour, and went on to suggest that offenders should be kicked out of the ground.

But it’s not just the players that endure such taunts. Guthrie relates a recent experience where, after objecting to some foul language, the perpetrator promptly told him that he could say what he liked, as he’d paid his money.

Over the years, I’ve experienced similar ugly incidents. A few years ago I was sitting with my aunt, uncle, and cousin’s pre-pubescent son. My cousin was absent for some reason that escapes me now. We used to sit in the back row (or nearby) of ground level because my uncle has limited mobility.

Some time during the first quarter I had to ask the two guys (fellow Carlton supporters) directly behind me to watch their swearing, please. I hesitated to do so because, as any sensible patron knows, altercations are best avoided at the footy; just ask the father of Melbourne player Nathan Jones.

From what I recall, the swearing wasn’t vehement, but it was constant, uttered every time the “wrong” decision was made, or the players erred, or the other team scored. And it was clearly audible. Perhaps I might have put up with it on my own, I don’t know, but I was particularly conscious of my young cousin having to hear it, let alone it being unpleasant for my aunt.

So I asked. The response? “We’re at the foo-deee!”

I can’t recall what I said next, but it would have been along the lines of “So what?” Why on earth do some people think that anything goes at the footy? Does the antagonist of Guthrie’s tale hurl abuse in the cinema when he pays money to see a movie? How about restaurants, or pubs, or public transport?

Leading figures and commentators from the game (in addition to McGuire) regularly denounce such foul antics, and scoreboards at both Melbourne venues consistently display a warning about foul language each week. Why do these bozos remain deaf to what the larger football community acknowledges as a major issue.

There’s even a mobile number you can text if the trouble persists. Guthrie believes this is problematic, as it encourages patrons to dob rather than deal with it, and may make security staff more complacent, relying on public alerts instead of confronting anything suspect directly. But I disagree. It’s a comfort to know it’s there, that the AFL does take the issue seriously and will act if required – not that I’m yet to test the system. I have seen security from time to time (my main focus is the game, after all), and trust that they will step in when needed; they can’t keep an eye on everybody, so it’s reasonable that they rely on the public to inform them.

And I have anecdotal evidence. Once my antagonists had poo-pooed my request they, after a brief break, returned to usual form. Quarter breaks probably helped to douse some of the heat from the situation, but they clearly didn’t regard me seriously and, like mischievous kids, openly enjoyed flouting the “rules.”

Seeing red, I got up to seek support. I may have even heard some genuine worry from my antagonists (Shit!). Unable to see any uniformed police, I then spied a middle-aged man wearing a visible wire and speaking into a phone, or perhaps it was a walkie-talkie. Was he “security”? He wasn’t, but he wanted to know why I asked. So I briefly explained about the bad language, and how it didn’t stop, despite repeated requests.

And so he followed me back, where I pointed out the offenders, and then returned to my seat. Bleating their objections, they sounded more like sheepish schoolboys – “It wasn’t me, Mister” – than mature adults. But it stopped. Shortly, my Auntie alerted me that they’d left.

Make no mistake, I ain’t no wowser. I can swear with the best of them, and sometimes it just can’t be helped; we’re all fallible. And as Guthrie says, whilst it’s reasonable to make some allowances for the passion inspired by sport, it “shouldn't descend to the level of a biker buck's night.”

When that man came to my aid, I felt vindicated; still, it required some effort to uphold a standard. Perhaps if more people protested, these ugly supporters might be more inclined to heed the warning in the first place. Perhaps. Next time, I will resort to the texting option (I hadn’t been aware of it at the time), and trust that the AFL will make good on its service.

Our game is often celebrated for its ability to appeal to all types of people, to transcend any so-called cultural divide. And yet clearly, the message has gotten stuck in the crack. Now’s the time for all clubs to take it on board and spread the word. Guthrie suggests signage at the ground is a good way to go, for starters. As he notes, the onfield antics have been cleaned up, now it’s time to deal with the stands.

Monday, July 25, 2011

Why follow a team?

Martin Flanagan, an essayist, novelist and columnist for The Age, sees Australia, and perhaps more specifically, Victoria, through the lens of Australian rules football. His writings on footy focus on the local, sidelines and peripheral stories that happen around footy. He writes in search of an essence of footy; looking for what it means to people who are either on the margins of the mainstream or central figures on the periphery. His novel The Call told the life story of Tom Wills - one of the pioneers of footy - while, The Game in a Time of War, written around 2001, places footy in a broader social political context. One essay is based around a visit to the footy with Waheed Aly - a now prominent writer, lawyer and columnist. At the time, however, Aly was just another (dispirited) Richmond fan. Flanagan, perhaps, sees footy as one of the archetypal Australian experiences. But his imagining of footy differs from that of popular shows which emphasise singular stories of great achievements and macho-ness. Flanagan is interested in the life stories of footy-individuals and what they reveal about both the game and contemporary Australian society. Flanagan doesn't seem to reveal the team that he supports - if indeed he does support one particular team. This seems to be a wise choice: he can jump from team to team, documenting the stories of its players, supporters, and club workers. Other writers and commentators on the other hand are easily identifiable as supportors of particular teams: Caroline Wilson with Richmond, Rohon Connolly with Essendon, Gerard Whately with Geelong, and Tim Lane with Carlton.

Flanagan's ability to jump from team to team, fan to fan, contrasts with the image of the diehard fan - endlessly supporting a team that loses perpetually. In a recent story on an elderly fan (on a club's official website), she said she had been to every game (except for interstate matches) for the past 50 years. This period covers about 20 years of success and 30 years of drudgery. Would be better if 30 years of drudgery was followed by 20 years of success? Perhaps. One's team is like a character in a bildungsroman: the team is a hero who dreams of becoming great. Efforts are made, support is enlisted, endless and repetitive training is carried out before going headlong into the world (i.e. the great competition of the Ay Ef El). If my team were a novel it would be somewhere between a mix of Cervantes's [The Ingenious Gentleman] Don Quixote [of La Mancha] and Goethe's The Sorrow's of Young Werther. It is a team that is endlessly hopeful, idealistic and convinced of the accuracy of its own planning, before it spirals downwards into a suicidal depression. The temptations of Flanagan's method abound.

The competition, however, is a novel without end and without a narrator who is in possesion of any single moral compass to direct his (her!) sense of justice. (And perhaps that is why at the end of yet another loss, some teams' supportors can be heard, whining 'it's not fair'). Yep, it sure ain't. A team, like Don Quixote, can find countless ways to fail, to screw up the plans. The commentators, wisely looking on in the manner of Sancho Panza, explain exactly to the letter why it was already written in fate prior to the game. It ain't fair and it sure as hell doesn't (and won't) have a happy ending.